Politics at paulcarvill.com, the home of Paul Carvill on the web

link: paulcarvill at flickr

paulcarvill.com

Hi, I'm Paul Carvill and I'm a web developer. I am Head of Interface Development at LBi, Europe's largest digital agency.

I also like walking, cooking, Bollywood and rock 'n' roll.

Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

More democracy, more humanity, more t-shirts

Monday, July 25th, 2011

“…more democracy, more openness, more humanity…” — Norway’s Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, on his nation’s response to the horrific violence which occurred there last week. What a brave, optimistic, table-thumpingly urgent speech to give in the wake of almost a hundred deaths, the overwhelming majority of whom were teenagers.

More humanity - Threadless T-shirts, Nude No MoreI wanted to capture the resilience and hope of his statement, so I have done so in a very small way: I’ve put it on a t-shirt. I’ve submitted the t-shirt design to Threadless, the crowdsourced apparel website. If the design gets accepted to be sold on the site, Threadless pay the designer $2500 in cash and prizes.

If my design is accepted I’ll donate all the cash — and whatever I get from auctioning the prizes — to an appropriate charity in Norway to help the victims and their families of the awful bombing and shootings there last week.

You can help persuade Threadless to accept my design by ‘Liking’ it, tweeting about it or otherwise sharing it.

Alternatively, why not create your own “More democracy, more humanity” t-shirt and submit the design to Threadless yourself? The better the design, the more chance of it getting accepted.

Opposing government and corporate censorship of the web

Sunday, December 5th, 2010

I’ve added an A record to my domain, pointing http://wikileaks.paulcarvill.com to the IP address Wikileaks is currently serving their website from.

I’ve done this as a simple gesture of my support for Wikileaks and my opposition to arbitrary censorship of the web by governments and corporations.

This follows the dropping of the wikileaks.org domain by EveryDNS, the Californian ISP, and the removal of WikiLeaks from Amazon’s EC2 cloud computing service.

How does my action help? DNS is a hierarchical system, and the removal of a domain name from the system makes it much harder for most people to find a website — you need to use the numerical IP address instead e.g. 88.80.13.160 (try putting that in your web browser’s address bar — it’s WikiLeaks‘ own IP address). Adding a subdomain to my website which points at the WikiLeaks site will hopefully make it that much easier to find, and that much more resilient to government and corporate interference.

There’s more info in this Guardian news article, and here at Jamie McClelland’s website. You can find other people participating in this effort by searching Twitter for the #imwikileaks hashtag.

***** UPDATE: *****
It is also possible to become a full mirror of the contents of the WikiLeaks website. You can find information on how to do this on the WikiLeaks site http://213.251.145.96/mass-mirror and also on any other sites currently mirroring WikiLeaks e.g. http://wikileaks.gooby.org/mass-mirror.

The content is static, and can be securely administered by WikiLeaks themselves. It is currently around 2-3 GB in size.

The free distribution of data, and resistance to top-down evaluation of the merit of that data, is what the web excels at. It is more important now than ever before that individuals are allowed to publish and consume information as they see fit, within the bounds of the law. The world wide web, must be allowed to operate neutrally and independently of governments and corporations, including domain name registrars, ISPs, data carriers and other and infrastructure providers. Everyone who uses the web benefits from such independence, and should promote and support it wherever possible.

Draper. Balls. Spot the difference.

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

Do Don Draper — Ed Balls looky-likey? I think so.

The side-parting. The Krazee-Eyes Killah stare. The brutal undercurrent of swaggering libido. The feeling that he might just punch you in the face if you look at him the wrong way. Draper. Balls. Men. Spot the goddamn difference.

Sneering and electioneering – digital media and politics in 2010

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Here’s a great Guardian article about the 2010 election being the first real online election. Its argument is driven home by the fact that at the time of the last election in 2005,

“YouTube was only two months old; Twitter and Facebook weren’t even invented.”

I think exciting times are definitely ahead, but I do worry that the flurry of digital activity around election time will be an ephemeral phenomenon. Surely long-term engagement should be paramount, and there are big blogs out there like conservativehome which are successful in that area, but most people’s focus does seem to wander when not faced with immediate political decision to be made.

MyDavidCameron.com is a great example of this short-focus politically reactionary approach. It’s very, very funny, but does it cross partisan boundaries or reach any further than sneery articles in the leftist media? Probably not, although its effects may be more subtler than that, perhaps just acting as a gentle background hum, adding weight to peoples’ existing prejudices.

I do try to be as politically engaged as possible, and the web is such a perfect vehicle for it, but I find most of the offerings out there to be spectacularly biased or single-issue. Someone please prove me wrong, with some intelligent debate and positive action that can be found outside of the national press.

Meet the team

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

It’s interesting to compare these photographs of the US Cabinet teams taken by Annie Liebowitz.  The first is a series of shots of Obama’s team which appear in this month’s Vanity Fair.  Two things leap out at you — the relaxed demeanour of the group, which might also be translated as unruffled or unready; and the artifice, the under-construction aesthetic of the stage they appear on.  This is a photograph of a nebulous team, only part-formed and not yet a cohesive unit.

010203b1

Almost half the subjects aren’t looking at the camera.  Arne Duncan, secretary of education, plays with his shirt cuff and glances stage left.  Robert Gates, the Republican secretary of defense, is making an odd finger point gesture, and seems preoccupied.  Only Hillary Clinton, secretary of state, is fully alert and engaged in the process of being photographed.  It’s a powerful photo, full of meaning, and one which we will infer more from as the years go by.  

Already, the smiling Tom Daschle has withdrawn his nomination for secretary of health and human services because of an imbroglio involving $128,000 in unpaid taxes, which is has surely caused some embarrassment to President Obama.

Following them is a photograph taken in the Cabinet Room of the White House in December 2001.  George W. Bush’s team resemble nothing so much as a gruesome gallery of white-collar criminals caught with their hands in the account ledgers.  Their mundane arrogance is truly startling.  Bush, jacket swept back and hands flamboyantly tucket into his pockets, stares at you and dares you to enter the frame.  I suspect that if you had, Rumsfeld would have forcefully put the boot in.

Photos of Obama’s Cabinet

Photo of George W. Bush’s Cabinet

Foot in mouth

Wednesday, November 7th, 2007

David Cameron’s recent comments regarding arts funding highlight imporant facets of the Conservative agenda. The sequence of quiet tutting that followed them reveals more about Britain and its media than the comments themselves.

Comment has focused on the anger of the Lithuanian community, apparently personally affronted by Cameron’s characterisation of them as a circus act. This misses the point entirely. David Cameron did not mean to target a particular section of the European community as deserving our mockery. His speech reveals the Tories’ contempt for diversity, for multiculturalism, especially in the arts. It showed the Tories’ fear of the fringes and desperation to inhabit and control the middle ground and, by extension, Middle England.

His plea for “a grown-up argument” was undermined by his juvenile stereotyping of non-mainstream arts as freakish or laughable. This is xenophobia in the extreme, an element that is at the heart of the Tory party’s makeup and always will be.

Related links:

Right-wing idiot bucket ConservativeHome’s views on Camerno’s recent immigration speech

David Cameron’s speech: The Chalenges of a Growing Population

The Daily Mail;s coverage of the same “quip”

John Bolton – with agressive former UN ambassadors like these, who needs enemies?

Wednesday, April 25th, 2007

Is former US ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton one of the most arrogant, contemptuous, condescending politicians of the modern age?

I’ve just watched his interview on Newsnight, and he comes across as someone as ill-suited to a job in international relations as it is possible to be!

Combine barely-disguised ridicule of Gavin Essler’s probing questions, a hardline pro-war stance and a cryptic pseudo-threat that we (presumably the British, but encompassing all anti-Iraq war Europeans) should beware America’s withdrawal from Iraq and other places “closer to home”, and you don’t have to wonder to hard why America has such a disastrous international reputation.

I previously saw Bolton on BBC Question Time on March 22nd, flushed once again with seetinhg self-importance, and refusing to even respond to Tony Benn’s repeated enquiries relating to Iraw and WMD on the grounds that it wasn’t worth the effort.

Indeed, with hawkish, agressive former UN ambassadors like these, who needs enemies!

NB. In 200 John Bolton said

“There is no doubt in our mind that Saddam Hussein has an active chemical and biological warfare effort.”

NB Related link – Naomi Wolf’s hefty and controversial editorial tracing a fascist lineage from Hitler To Bush, and the historical steps taken by all states in a process of destroying constitutional freedoms – Fascist America in 10 Easy Steps

Less jingo, more bingo

Tuesday, January 30th, 2007

I was pleasantly surprised to see the front page of The Sun today going with a headline and image I would normally have expected to see running in the corduroy-wearing, sandal-footed Independent:

sunfrontpage.gif

It’s a bold statement on the contradictory success and failure of British multiculturalism. It’s riding the wave of interest in the subject generated by Shilp Shetty’s racist, or not, treatment in Celebrity Big Brother, which has dominated the news cycle across both qualities and tabloids for the past 10 days

And all this as the Independent turns into an outraged parody of itself…
independentfrontpage.jpg

Decisions, decisions

Thursday, April 14th, 2005

Who Should You Vote For is quite an interesting site if you need a bit of help deciding who you should vote for in the upcoming election.

(more…)